OML issue?

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Mon Jul 18 13:05:59 UTC 2011


Hi Holger,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:12:26PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:

> Now my understanding might be wrong but I think the administrative state is
> something we want to 'maintain' from the BSC. So I think the administrative
> state should survive a BTS disconnect.

Ok, seems fine to me.  Feel free to apply.  I'll do some tests with
osmo-bts later today, and fix it up if it causes any problems.

Right now I'm doing a port of osmo-bts to libosmo-abis, just to get some
experience with it.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list