Adding patches to wireshark...

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Omar Atia omar.atia at its.ws
Wed Jan 12 07:45:30 UTC 2011


Dear Holger,,

Sorry for bothering you a lot .
OML doesn't appear in the filter means failed to patch , let me again repeat
everything with autoconf -i.

Thanks,
Omar Atia

-----Original Message-----
From: openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org
[mailto:openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org] On Behalf Of Holger Hans Peter
Freyther
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:13 PM
To: openbsc at lists.gnumonks.org
Subject: Re: Adding patches to wireshark...

On 01/11/2011 09:45 PM, omar.atia at its.ws wrote:
> Dear Holger,
> Yes , I found two 1 location update reject and one location update accept
.is this abis oml ?
> Thanks,
> Omar

well,

same thing again. You should write what you have tried to answer this
question
your self. Wireshark supports filters, you can filter for a given
protocol...
this way it is super easy to figure out if you have any OML messages in the
trace...





More information about the OpenBSC mailing list