This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Nico,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:06:54PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> But thinking more about this... does it really make sense to store
> anything but control data and the actual PDU in the database? When sending
> a message from the vty the message is encoded anyway, so just inserting
> the PDU + control data should be sufficient. I'm not sure if OpenBSC has
> to be aware of things like UDHI, UDH, PID and thelike.
well, what you definitely want aside from the PDU is 'valid_until', which is a
result of PDU parsing...
But yes, generally,
* there should be no decoded SMS in the database (and if it is, only for
debugging, i.e. no code should ever use the human-readable decode
* there should be no direct references to the subscriber table
(sender_id/receiver_id). Rather, the actual phone number (MSISDN) should
be used.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)