This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Zecke,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2009 13:23:10 Harald Welte wrote:
>
> > You are now redefiniing the LAC 0 to something like the opposite case,
> > which I don't particularly like. Is there some alternative solution?
>
> I didn't think about the IMSI DETACH case. One easy alternative is to use the
> other reserved lac value. With the least significant bit set 0 and all others
> to 1 (so 0xfffe... ETSI always makes me unsure about it).
I think LAC = 0xfffe seems to be the way to go for paging of all BTS, wile
we keep LAC = 0 for the 'user is detached' case.
Regards,
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)