This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > > > So maybe we need hard-code which software to prefer for activation or we
> > > > put some warnings in the wiki.
> > >
> > > why? If you say we are activating the most recently activated software,
> > > why is there a need for a warning of any sort? Or why would we need to
> > > hardcode?
> >
> > the problem is, that at least on my nanoBTS, the most recently activated
> > software was not the correct one and I had to manually activate the correct
> > one.
>
> the question is: which is the 'correct' one? this is a choice only the
> administrator can take, based on his information of which versions are
> installed in the BTS, and his information on what differentiates those software
> versions.
To summarize: I think it is good if we simply document the fact that we will
activate the default software, and that it is the users responsibility to ensure
the default software will work.
What we should do, though, is to create a list of known-working ip.access
firmware versions on the wiki.
Regards,
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)