This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:41:06PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > I didn't even knew the one I had was multi-TRX. OpenBSC doesn't handle > that for nanoBTS I think (or does it ?) "multi-TRX" in this context simply means that you can stack multiple unit to behave like one BTS with multiple TRX rather than multiple BTS with one TRX each. We don't have explicit support for it in OpenBSC so far, but I think there should be nothing major missing either, as we already support multiple TRX in the E1 case. All we have is suddenly two TCP connections with RSL rather than one. It probably boils down to somebody testing it and tracing any remaining bug, but there's no fundamental part of the code that needs massive changes to support this. I'm in the process of building one of those custom modified RJ69 cables that you need to stack them. I'm busy with lots of other work, and it is not of very high importance, though. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)