This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone heard of a nanoBTS without EFR support ? I think it is extremely unlikely, as all nanoBTS have been built long after EFR was introduced. I could imagine them not supporting AMR, but even that seems unlikely. > I have one here that responds with BIND_NACK if the codec is EFR but > works ok if I set V1 meybe it's related to the RTP PAYLOAD TYPE IE or something like that... -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)