This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Andreas.Eversberg Andreas.Eversberg at versatel.dei am not sure, if the variables bts and trx will be used in the future, so i left them as comments. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org [mailto:openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org] Im Auftrag von Holger Freyther Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. November 2009 10:20 An: openbsc at lists.gnumonks.org Betreff: Re: patch: fix of compiler warnings On Monday 16 November 2009 18:52:32 Andreas.Eversberg wrote: > diff --git a/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c b/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c > index 815fe2b..3b451b1 100644 > --- a/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c > +++ b/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c > @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int nm_state_event(enum nm_evt evt, u_int8_t > obj_class, void *obj, > static int sw_activ_rep(struct msgb *mb) > { > struct abis_om_fom_hdr *foh = msgb_l3(mb); > - struct gsm_bts *bts = mb->trx->bts; > - struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = gsm_bts_trx_num(bts, > foh->obj_inst.trx_nr); > +// struct gsm_bts *bts = mb->trx->bts; > +// struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = gsm_bts_trx_num(bts, > foh->obj_inst.trx_nr); was this intentional? Is the warning that these are unused? In this case we will just nuke the variable declaration.