This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Andreas.Eversberg Andreas.Eversberg at versatel.dei am not sure, if the variables bts and trx will be used in the future, so i left them as comments.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org [mailto:openbsc-bounces at lists.gnumonks.org] Im Auftrag von Holger Freyther
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. November 2009 10:20
An: openbsc at lists.gnumonks.org
Betreff: Re: patch: fix of compiler warnings
On Monday 16 November 2009 18:52:32 Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
> diff --git a/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c b/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c
> index 815fe2b..3b451b1 100644
> --- a/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c
> +++ b/openbsc/src/bsc_init.c
> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int nm_state_event(enum nm_evt evt, u_int8_t
> obj_class, void *obj,
> static int sw_activ_rep(struct msgb *mb)
> {
> struct abis_om_fom_hdr *foh = msgb_l3(mb);
> - struct gsm_bts *bts = mb->trx->bts;
> - struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = gsm_bts_trx_num(bts,
> foh->obj_inst.trx_nr);
> +// struct gsm_bts *bts = mb->trx->bts;
> +// struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = gsm_bts_trx_num(bts,
> foh->obj_inst.trx_nr);
was this intentional? Is the warning that these are unused? In this case we
will just nuke the variable declaration.