This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Freyther zecke at selfish.orgOn Thursday 04 June 2009 10:27:28 Andreas.Eversberg wrote: > i can test this. i will remove bts pointer and only check lac when > detaching. when paging, i will loop all bts and add a paging request to > all bts with that pointer. if the paging responds, we receive the lchan > and then stop paging requests to other bts' (if any). if we receive > resonse, we ignore them, if we already received an lchan. (error case > when two mobiles share same imsi or other error cases). > > what about the "VLR" patch? where is it? why do you need a VLR? (HLR??) > Please see the mail "[PATCH 0/3] Channel requests/Management in gsm_subscriber" from 2009-04-19 21:20 and "[RFC] Patches for better channel management". The bottom line of the patches are to make the "paging" layer more internal and request a lchan for a given subscriber (finding the right bts, checking if we have capacity, checking if the MS has capacity, properly queuing things). I will rediff this over the weekend as well. z.