[op25-dev] WBX or BasicRX ?
Marcus D. Leech
mleech at ripnet.com
Sat Mar 15 03:42:38 UTC 2014
On 03/14/2014 11:36 PM, ikj1234i at yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi Matt !
> Pleasant surprise to run into you- here's my interpretation of the
> issue with uhd: the version of libusb that comes with stock ubuntu
> 12.04 doesn't define the symbol 'libusb_error_name' - consequently uhd
> fails to build. This is all in a pybombs context, btw. It appears
> that symbol was defined somewhere around version 1.0.9 of libusb which
> is newer than what's included in ubuntu 12.04. Ubuntu 12.04 is listed
> BTW on the ettus.com site as being one of the supported releases for uhd.
> The net-net for end users is that on ubuntu 12.04 if the user attempts
> to issue the command
> pybombs install gr-op25
> on a clean ubuntu 12.04 box there is a failure in the step where uhd
> is being built... Let me know if I can furnish any other details or
> if the above is insufficient / unclear
> Best Regards
It happens on Fedora systems, too, for libusb < 1.0.9.
There's a HAVE_LIBUSB_ERROR_NAME variable that is supposed to be set by
the cmake, but it isn't set properly always, and the b200_iface.cpp doesn't
pick up the proper macro definition.
This has been identified to the dev team, but I guess not fixed yet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the op25-dev