Compile of libnl failed

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/linux-dect@lists.osmocom.org/.

Stephan Meier stephan at timeba.se
Fri Jun 28 11:31:06 UTC 2013


Hi,

not really. Your errors seems more like a resource problem on your
machine...

Cheers,
Stephan
On 06/28/2013 12:39 PM, Alexander wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am compiling on Debian 6.0.5 using autoconf from the official repository (cannot check version now, but believe it is something like 2.6x too).
> I'll try your fix to see if it works for me. Did you get the similar 137 error before?
> 
> With best regards,
> Alexander
> 
> 
> 28.06.2013, 11:17, "Stephan Meier" <stephan at timeba.se>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> which Version of autoconf are you using? With my proposed fix and
>> autoconf 2.69 on ubuntu 12.10 libnl compiles fine.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stephan
>>
>> On 06/27/2013 11:11 PM, Александр wrote:
>>
>>>  Yeah, I also cannot compile libnl, getting double error:
>>>  Killed
>>>  autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 137
>>>  aclocal: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 137
>>>  autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 137
>>>
>>>  Tried to report this in several ways, still no success
>>>
>>>  26.06.2013, 22:41, "Stephan Meier" <stephan at timeba.se>:
>>>>  On 06/26/2013 08:03 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>>>   On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Stephan Meier wrote:
>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   after cloning libnl from git://dect.osmocom.org/git/libnl.git, I tried
>>>>>>   to compile it. It breaks while trying to compile the "nl-pktloc-lookup"
>>>>>>   binary. It seems to be caused by line 131 in src/Makefile.am (LDADD
>>>>>>   statement that overwrites the linker flags set before). Removing this
>>>>>>   line and thus using the "old" linker flags works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Is this the desired behavior or did anybody just forget to delete this line?
>>>>>   Not sure, have you checked libnl upstream? I can merge with the latest
>>>>>   version, but bugs unrelated to DECT should be fixed there first.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Cheers,
>>>>>   Patrick
>>>>  The upstream Version builds fine, so it would be nice if you could do a
>>>>  merge. Are there any plans to merge the DECT changes upstream?
>>>>
>>>>  Cheers,
>>>>  Stephan
> 





More information about the linux-dect mailing list