This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
neels gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgneels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/24544 ) Change subject: osmo_select_shutdown: allow finishing pending writes on sigterm ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Here is a proposal, an idea to get rid of the unconditional sleep() we have in at least osmo-bsc. I just hacked it up and it seems to work, any reasons why this could be a bad idea? https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/24544/1/src/select.c File src/select.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/24544/1/src/select.c@103 PS1, Line 103: bool osmo_select_shutdown_done = false; maybe these should rather be function calls, to be able to extend the functionality in the future? void osmo_select_shutdown_request() { _osmo_select_shutdown = true; }; bool osmo_select_shutdown_requested() { return _osmo_select_shutdown; }; bool osmo_select_shutdown_done() { return _osmo_select_shutdown_done; }; I'm not sure whether that is helping or just bloat. what do you think? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/24544 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib94d4316924103459577087c2214188679db2227 Gerrit-Change-Number: 24544 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:40:35 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210604/4b6a9c16/attachment.htm>