This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
fixeria gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgfixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/22611 ) Change subject: TRXC: add proposal for multiple Training Sequences ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/22611/1/common/chapters/trx_if.adoc File common/chapters/trx_if.adoc: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/22611/1/common/chapters/trx_if.adoc@198 PS1, Line 198: ---- > Ack Well, we're dealing with a *human readable* protocol here. I would love to go for something more convenient, so we would not need to mess with sprintf() / sscanf(), but re-designing the TRXC is out of scope so far. I just wanted this command to look a bit more readable. With timeslot and subslot it's logical that the former goes first, from the hierarchical point of view. With the training sequence and set we could assume that set goes first, but the more parameters we add, the harder it gets to grasp what corresponds to what without looking at the protocol reference. Regarding parsing complexity, it's just a longer format string for sscanf(), nothing special. If you both insist, I would change to plain numbers. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/22611 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-gsm-manuals Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I621e46edac5d748472fd645f81876116904e260c Gerrit-Change-Number: 22611 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:49:25 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210202/5041e719/attachment.htm>