This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
iedemam gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgiedemam has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234 ) Change subject: stats: add BTS uptime counter ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (3 comments) Hi Pepsin, Thanks for the review. I've addressed the first two items. The third has hopefully been explained better now but I'm open to suggestions. Regards, -Michael https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234/4/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c File src/osmo-bsc/bts.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234/4/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c@571 PS4, Line 571: if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tp) != 0) { > osmo_clock_gettime Oops, sorry. I missed this from a previous comment. Fixed now. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234/4/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c@580 PS4, Line 580: if (uptime_seconds < 0) { > This cannot happen with a monotonic clock? Unless you run for crazy amount of years without reboot w […] True. My consideration was that there may be scheduling jitter between reading uptime and setting the last_uptime_read state. I forgot we're running in a single thread though and this will never happen. Removed. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234/4/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c@586 PS4, Line 586: int downtime_seconds = BTS_DOWNTIME_SAMPLE_INTERVAL - uptime_seconds; > There's something here I'm not really following. […] Yes, hopefully we always see very nearly zero downtime. :-) The last_uptime_read variable is also updated outside of this loop when a connection is reestablished. Let's say that happens half-way between calls to this timer loop. Now instead of seeing 10 seconds of elapsed uptime, we will only see 5 seconds of "new" uptime. This gives us 5 seconds which were interrupted in some way, signaling downtime. Testing this locally by disrupting the BTS<->BSC connection results in seemingly accurate downtime numbers. It could perhaps be improved but I'm satisfied with the result so far. Suggestions welcome. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23234 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib17674bbe95e828cebff12de9e0b30f06447ef6c Gerrit-Change-Number: 23234 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: iedemam <michael at kapsulate.com> Gerrit-Assignee: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:50:18 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210430/7ccdf300/attachment.htm>