This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21204 )
Change subject: hodec 2: favor moving dyn TS
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21204/4//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21204/4//COMMIT_MSG@23
PS4, Line 23: Among lchans on dynamic timeslots that could be moved, this code favors moving
: later lchans; mainly because it makes for a simpler condition in the code.
> here
I'm not completely against it, but I'm not sure this is a really good reason...
So if I understand correctly, from time to time you end up moving calls from a dyn ts to another in the same TRX (with no real gain doing so?) simply because the code is easier? I'm not sure this convinces me...
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21204
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic221b8d2687cdec0bf94410c84a4da43853f0900
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21204
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:10:47 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20201117/f1eb7eef/attachment.htm>