Change in osmo-e1d[master]: introduce notion of 'driver'

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Mon Jun 29 15:26:24 UTC 2020


laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19041 )

Change subject: introduce notion of 'driver'
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

> I'm just wondering if a "type" is enough or if it should be struct with function pointers to the various operations / handlers for that driver.

if you want to build a plugin architecture with an ABI, you need the function dispatch (e1_driver_ops).  As long a we don't know how those drivers look like, we can either live with compiled-in drivers, they can be handled by switch() statements.  I prefer to introduce infrastructure "as we go" and hence started simple.


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19041
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-e1d
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic168e25f2622b397bac2c133ec35f4a0a38f859b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19041
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Assignee: tnt <tnt at 246tNt.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: tnt <tnt at 246tNt.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:26:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200629/d59e135b/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list