This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953 )
Change subject: add full SDP codec information to the MNCC socket
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(7 comments)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c
File src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@10
PS6, Line 10: /* In order of preference. TODO: make configurable */
Are we adding regression here? Wasn't it already configurable before?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@11
PS6, Line 11: static const enum gsm48_bcap_speech_ver mobile_codecs[] = {
Not sure if it really makes sense having this static here.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@107
PS6, Line 107: for (a->payload_type = 96; a->payload_type <= 127; a->payload_type++) {
would be great having defines for this numbers (96,127).
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c
File src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c@170
PS6, Line 170: const struct codec_mapping *codec_mapping_by_gsm0808_speech_codec_type(enum gsm0808_speech_codec_type sct, uint16_t cfg)
either fix the TODO or mark cfg as unused for the compiler.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08_cc.c
File src/libmsc/gsm_04_08_cc.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08_cc.c@1261
PS6, Line 1261: GSM48_PDISC_CC | (trans->transaction_id << 4),
wrong indentation.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c
File src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c@558
PS6, Line 558: if (codec->rate != 8000)
Next time, please split this kind of stuff into separate commits for easier review.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err
File tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err@429
PS6, Line 429:
This empty line in stderr (libosmocore log) looks suspìcious.As if you are adding an extra \n somewhere.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8c3b2de53ffae4ec3a66b9dabf308c290a2c999f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15953
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:06:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200602/eed00e22/attachment.htm>