This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
neels gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgneels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953 )
Change subject: add full SDP codec information to the MNCC socket
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(7 comments)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6//COMMIT_MSG@39
PS6, Line 39: mnccc_release_sent
> ccc? ;)
heh we should invent that, a hacker's call control interface for congresses
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c
File src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@10
PS6, Line 10: /* In order of preference. TODO: make configurable */
> Are we adding regression here? Wasn't it already configurable before?
i should check that indeed.
I think the preference passed from the BSS still matters most, but I should take another look
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@11
PS6, Line 11: static const enum gsm48_bcap_speech_ver mobile_codecs[] = {
> Not sure if it really makes sense having this static here.
right, doesn't
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@27
PS6, Line 27: static const enum gsm48_bcap_speech_ver utran_codecs[] = {
neither
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c
File src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c@170
PS6, Line 170: const struct codec_mapping *codec_mapping_by_gsm0808_speech_codec_type(enum gsm0808_speech_codec_type sct, uint16_t cfg)
> either fix the TODO or mark cfg as unused for the compiler.
how?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c
File src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c@558
PS6, Line 558: if (codec->rate != 8000)
> Next time, please split this kind of stuff into separate commits for easier review.
will split, missed this one
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err
File tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err@429
PS6, Line 429:
> This empty line in stderr (libosmocore log) looks suspìcious. […]
will check
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8c3b2de53ffae4ec3a66b9dabf308c290a2c999f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15953
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:13:56 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200711/d9d3fbef/attachment.htm>