This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/17218 ) Change subject: bitvec: avoid redundant zero-initialization in bitvec_alloc() ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: I'm not a big fan of such over-optimization patches. What if somebody inrtoduces new fields into the struct at some later point? And if those are not explicitly initialized? I would want to discuss such patches once somebody really runs into performance problems and has profiling data that shows these are the bottlenecks. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/17218 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I40c0322d5f2febd98bae6fbe0ec2132eda6fb35b Gerrit-Change-Number: 17218 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:21:06 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200219/125a3f94/attachment.htm>