This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/19762 ) Change subject: stream: Fix log of IPv6 during accept() ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/19762/1/src/stream.c File src/stream.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/19762/1/src/stream.c@849 PS1, Line 849: is_ > Both ways are fine, they ar ebacked by the documentation: […] yes, but the size could be coincidence. MAybe 10 years from now there is some other sockaddr with the same size than sockaddr_in6? That's why I think checking the catual sa_family is superior. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/19762 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib13db8d135138059a70d18a8bba14e53c6514fa7 Gerrit-Change-Number: 19762 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis at fe80.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:55:39 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200825/acc38c91/attachment.htm>