This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/14686 ) Change subject: Clarify and refactor link quality (C/I) handling ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: No matter what we do, the resolutoin of 1/10th of dB (centi-bel) is for sure more than sufficient for the purpose of in terms of range, using uint16_t gives a range of 0..655.35 dB, which is certainly sufficient ;) So both from a resolution and from a range point of view, uint16_t is fine. What I'm a bit more worried is whether there could be negative values? But I guess if the interference is stronger than the carrier, we wouldn't detect the training sequence anymore? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/14686 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If624d6fdc0270e6813af8700d95f1345903c8a01 Gerrit-Change-Number: 14686 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: ipse <Alexander.Chemeris at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:59:22 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190714/c8c423b3/attachment.htm>