This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgHarald Welte has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12816 ) Change subject: bitvec: Add bitvec_tailroom_bits() function ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12816/2/tests/bitvec/bitvec_test.c File tests/bitvec/bitvec_test.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12816/2/tests/bitvec/bitvec_test.c@219 PS2, Line 219: for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { > Why only 8? Why not go over entire vector so both corner cases (no bits set vs all bits set) are cov […] It didn't occur to me that "all bits set" could also be a problematic case, if we had already established that it works for one byte/8bits. Everything from there is just a logical progression. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12816 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I8980a6b6d1973b67a2d9ad411c878d956fb428d1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 12816 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002) Gerrit-CC: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:56:39 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-HasLabels: No -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190204/531c6e47/attachment.htm>