This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Vadim Yanitskiy gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgVadim Yanitskiy has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13709 ) Change subject: common/oml.c: fix: properly encode NM_ATT_SW_CONFIG ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: > did you check how this is with a nanoBTS? I saw a few comments in OsmoBSC stating that nanoBTS is using a non-standard (spec. violating) attribute formatting. This can be also seen looking at the captures from OS#3814. > I think it's best to align with how they implement this. Not sure if it's a good idea to replicate such vendor-specific behaviour. The current patch follows what the specs. recommend to follow... > Also, the big question is what we do in terms of compatibility. > Maybe add it twice: both in the correct and in the incorrect form? Of course we can do that. But I would rather write a fix for OpenBSC. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13709 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Id26104719891944f3e2151df362bd45bb057a9c5 Gerrit-Change-Number: 13709 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002) Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-CC: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:58:57 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-HasLabels: No -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190419/29f456f9/attachment.htm>