This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Max gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgMax has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12227 ) Change subject: ACL: integrate sanitize check into sgsn_acl_* functions ...................................................................... Patch Set 5: > Patch Set 5: Code-Review-1 > > -1 since last version still don't apply my comments regarding movement of sanitize out of sgsn_acl_* callees. You haven't stated why you think it's better (unless I've missed it somehow). So the answer is still the same (and still in commit message): having this check in vty makes it hard to unit-test, having it as a static function next to sgsn_acl_* makes it unit-testable. I don't see any advantage in keeping code which is not directly related to vty inside sgsn_vty.c. Having sanitize function right next to where its result is used is way more intuitive and easier to maintain. Plus the advantage of unit testing. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12227 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic3dff108148683b107e9edac430a0475283580e9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 12227 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002) Gerrit-Reviewer: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: Stefan Sperling <stsp at stsp.name> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:05:50 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-HasLabels: No -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20181211/05c1819c/attachment.htm>