osmo-tetra[laforge/sq5bpf-rebase-20161218]: adding dmo support

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Thu Jun 22 06:52:05 UTC 2017


Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1

(4 comments)

Thnaks a lot for your contribution! It is very much appreciated, please forgitve me missing it in the patch review  so far.  It's not usual that it waits for three weeks.  If you hsould see that again, feel free to send a "ping" either by private mail or here as a "reply" on the patch.

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/2817/1/src/lower_mac/tetra_lower_mac.c
File src/lower_mac/tetra_lower_mac.c:

Line 106: 	[DPSAP_SCH_S] = {		//DMO Synchronization Burst Block 1
I would appreciate if you could avoid introducing // style comments, we don't use them in osmo-tetra (or the GSM related projects).  It's not a critical requirement, but I would appreciate it.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/2817/1/src/phy/tetra_burst.c
File src/phy/tetra_burst.c:

Line 305: #if 0	/* not used */
not used by whom? why? I think more context is needed here.  also, it seems like an unrelated change to DMO support, right? If so, please have separate patch explaining rationale in commitlog.


Line 367: 		break;	
extra whitspace at end of break


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/2817/1/src/phy/tetra_burst_sync.c
File src/phy/tetra_burst_sync.c:

Line 147: 			case (TETRA_TRAIN_NORM_1): /* fall through */
why do we add patenthesis here? The other cases work without?


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/2817
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifa5521d7313595384e74dd790a56550755b93fe9
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: osmo-tetra
Gerrit-Branch: laforge/sq5bpf-rebase-20161218
Gerrit-Owner: allesklar2 <jjuergens at seemoo.tu-darmstadt.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes



More information about the gerrit-log mailing list