This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 1: > No. I think "DEBUG" should be for debugging of issues in > production, not for debugging issues during initial development of > the code. I think it is highly unlikely that anyone would want to > see all the nitty-gritty details of the calculation in production > use. Maybe my perspective is skewed because I'm neck deep in the milenage and auth API nitty-gritty, at least at the moment I find it comforting to be able to switch on debugging on a production HLR and see what numbers it actually produced before going over the wire -- without having to recompile first. I think the few 'if (0)' in case debugging is off are sufficient to justify it. I accept though that I may find this too detailed myself once the certainty that all the algorithms and APIs around them are correct has settled. So now we need a decision... if you or anyone else confirms that it's too much for a run-time, I will disagree now (but most probably will never look back either) and change the patch. Make me do it though :) -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/1869 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifb36d010a4ac64c765517e15b9074424ec19cc60 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: No