This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Vadim Yanitskiy gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 9: > @Vadim: What does it take to move this forward? It saddens me that > your work looks like "almost complete" for months but still not > ready to merge. Hi Harald! Thanks for your attention! Sorry for delayed answer... Regarding to me, I am currently a bit busy with my educational process. Earlier the next month, I'll try to finish this change. Regarding to the change, there is a problem: despite all tests pass without any problems on my machine, some tests fail on Jenkins. I will try to find out, what's wrong. Also, there is a question, which isn't answered so far. As I already mentioned, the migrated code applies puncture for GPRS specific codes itself. So, I need to know, which approach is better: 1) To write additional non-punctured code definitions, and use them. As Tom said, this approach is better in terms of performance. 2) Rewrite the code to use shared code definitions from libosmocore/ src/gsm0503_conv.c. PS: Holiday greetings! -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/933 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I0c3256b87686d878e4e716d12393cad5924fdfa1 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Tom Tsou <tom at tsou.cc> Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: tnt <tnt at 246tNt.com> Gerrit-HasComments: No