From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Sat Aug 18 07:19:34 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:49:34 +0530
Subject: Custom calypso board
In-Reply-To: <20120710170019.GC30822@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120710170019.GC30822@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <CADKJHGYvDv8-_-m6JxHJZHbKr5K0+17pKcxYxdOTF_+btUgxxw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

>  * expose JTAG
>  * board-edge connector for plugging many boards into one backplane
>  * external clock input / buffered clock output
>  * RF connector standard u.fl or SMA or optionally separate Rx/Tx?
>  * I2C/SPI and both UARTs available on headers
>  * on-board EEPROM for storing persistent data, even beyond NOR flashing
>  * SIM card slot, SIM interface also present on header
>  * additional / unused TPU ports
>  * header for TSP / TPU and all data/control interfaces between iota/rita/calypso
>  * RTC crystal and footprint for lithium backup battery
>  * version of the board with uplink / downlink filters switched

I would suggest the board to have a connector that sends the  I Q
signals from say openbts directly to the dsp so that there wiil not be
a  need a usrp or any other rf board/singal generator to send the
signal through the SMA connector.

I would also suggest that DSP code be modified and not placed in DSP
ROM. This would help in writing our own dsp code and make the software
totally opensource.

Regards,
RM



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sat Aug 18 09:42:01 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:42:01 +0200
Subject: Custom calypso board
In-Reply-To: <CADKJHGYvDv8-_-m6JxHJZHbKr5K0+17pKcxYxdOTF_+btUgxxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120710170019.GC30822@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<CADKJHGYvDv8-_-m6JxHJZHbKr5K0+17pKcxYxdOTF_+btUgxxw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120818094201.GS29525@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi RM,

thansk for your feedback.

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:49:34PM +0530, R M wrote:

> I would suggest the board to have a connector that sends the  I Q
> signals from say openbts directly to the dsp so that there wiil not be
> a  need a usrp or any other rf board/singal generator to send the
> signal through the SMA connector.

I'm not quite sure if I'm following you.  OpenBTS is software, which
runs on e.g. a PC.  You want to get I/Q samples from the OpenBTS
transceiver program to the DSP.  What kind of "connector" do you
suggest?   The DSP doesn't have any interface that you could attach
directly to a PC.

Also, OpenBTS 'transceiver' itself implements more or less the same
functionality as the DSP in the Calypso.  So why would you want to
interface the two?  You want to run the Calypso board as a phone, and
OpenBTS as the GSM network and interface them directly using digital
baseband samples?  Then you would have one phone attached to one BTS,
not a very exciting setup for testing :/

I would presume as opposed to your suggestion, it would make more sense
to interface the ABB chip with the OpenBTS transceiver, _bypassing_ the
DSP.  This way, you could run the Calypso board as an inexpensive
transceiver, using its ABB + RF Frontend as a cheap radio.

> I would also suggest that DSP code be modified and not placed in DSP
> ROM. This would help in writing our own dsp code and make the software
> totally opensource.

lol.  And how exactly do you suggest to achieve that?  As the name
implies, it is _read only memory_.  How should we change the contents of
a mask rom on a chip that was manufactured years ago in a TI fab? ;)

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From Marco_Schwan at arcor.de  Tue Aug 14 13:40:21 2012
From: Marco_Schwan at arcor.de (Marco Schwan)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:40:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for the
	Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sylvain,

I have create a new patch. The patch select the uart at run time.

regards

marco


2012/7/18 Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com>:
>> I have make a patch for the Pirelli DP-L10 created. You can enable and
>> disable the patch in the makefile (src/target/firmware/Makefile).
>> The Keypad layout is tested with rssi.bin app. Only the power button
>> is not available.
>
> To be merge-able the patch would need to select at run time so that
> all built binaries built are functional at once. Right now this only
> creates a different set of wrong binaries ...
>
> Cheers,
>
>     Sylvain



From peter at stuge.se  Tue Aug 14 14:49:30 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:49:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>

Marco Schwan wrote:
> I have create a new patch. The patch select the uart at run time.

Please send it. Your email had no attachment. Remember to create a
commit using git with a nice commit message, and run git format-patch
to get the patch file. Alternatively, you can run git send-email to
send commits directly via email, but that requires a bit more
configuration.


//Peter



From Marco_Schwan at arcor.de  Tue Aug 14 19:48:23 2012
From: Marco_Schwan at arcor.de (Marco Schwan)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:48:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for the
	Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Sorry. I had forgot to attach the patch.
The patch is tested with the Pirelli DP-L10 and the Motorola C123.

regards

Marco

2012/8/14 Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>:
> Marco Schwan wrote:
>> I have create a new patch. The patch select the uart at run time.
>
> Please send it. Your email had no attachment. Remember to create a
> commit using git with a nice commit message, and run git format-patch
> to get the patch file. Alternatively, you can run git send-email to
> send commits directly via email, but that requires a bit more
> configuration.
>
>
> //Peter
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: automatic_select_the_uart.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120814/1f92544e/attachment.bin>

From peter at stuge.se  Tue Aug 14 19:55:00 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:55:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120814195500.17398.qmail@stuge.se>

Marco Schwan wrote:
> >> I have create a new patch. The patch select the uart at run time.

It looks like the UART number is still determined at compile time?

(By linking different init.c objects into the build.)


//Peter



From steve at steve-m.de  Tue Aug 14 20:05:50 2012
From: steve at steve-m.de (Steve Markgraf)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:05:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <20120814195500.17398.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814195500.17398.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <502AAF9E.5020901@steve-m.de>

Hi,

On 14.08.2012 21:55, Peter Stuge wrote:

> It looks like the UART number is still determined at compile time?
>
> (By linking different init.c objects into the build.)

Question is, where else do you want to store the initial mapping for
the specific board? Also, Reconfiguring it while runtime seems a bit
useless to me, how do you want to reconfigure it if you don't have a
serial link since you're connected to the 'wrong' UART anyway?

I would be fine with this solution in init.c. At least until we have,
if ever, something like stored settings in an NVRAM.

Regards,
Steve



From peter at stuge.se  Tue Aug 14 20:15:48 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:15:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <502AAF9E.5020901@steve-m.de>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814195500.17398.qmail@stuge.se> <502AAF9E.5020901@steve-m.de>
Message-ID: <20120814201549.19257.qmail@stuge.se>

Steve Markgraf wrote:
> I would be fine with this solution in init.c. At least until we have,
> if ever, something like stored settings in an NVRAM.

It's impossible to detect the particular hardware design at runtime?


//Peter



From steve at steve-m.de  Tue Aug 14 20:22:54 2012
From: steve at steve-m.de (Steve Markgraf)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:22:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <20120814201549.19257.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814195500.17398.qmail@stuge.se> <502AAF9E.5020901@steve-m.de>
	<20120814201549.19257.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <502AB39E.7040102@steve-m.de>

On 14.08.2012 22:15, Peter Stuge wrote:
> It's impossible to detect the particular hardware design at runtime?

Yes, that's why we have different init.c files for each board. Okay,
for the uart we could do some sort of auto-probing and listen on both
uarts, but then again that would be sort of an overkill I guess.

Regards,
Steve



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Tue Aug 14 22:51:25 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:51:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change the keypad layout and the uart port number for
	the Pirelli DP-L10
In-Reply-To: <CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACnUDy5M-4HcqsVBb8dvAbE+xCcFH0xGzNbFzLSUeCRFbUqUTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j088ZzYFJpvckcO3Os9VZtf-Gb9N8Ba5eo86Re3oZHfKhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACnUDy6mTO0aio8mCnN7oGW1g3ju-06trxgJ1GneYr+D86KzNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120814144930.18788.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CACnUDy5udR2mjHMMsMCVt-xpL7FaBb5rRbt7b=QRnzMWkS+dJw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120814225125.GG21172@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Marco,

thanks for your effort to provide another patch.

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:48:23PM +0200, Marco Schwan wrote:
> Sorry. I had forgot to attach the patch.
> The patch is tested with the Pirelli DP-L10 and the Motorola C123.

However, I see the following issues:

* it only addresses the UART, not the keypad
* it introduces a function call for something that's compile determined

As discussed elsewhere in the thread, we cannot detect the model/board
at runtime.  That's OK, and you are note expected to change that.

However, introducing a function call just to get a constant value is
probably a bit overkill.  A simpler way would be simply introduce a
'const uint8_t' in the board-specific C files, declare it in some common
header file and use it from within the UART code.

The even cleaner solution is to have something like a sercomm_init()
call which each of the board init files call, specifying the UART number
at that time.

The general rule is:
 * _within_ the board-specific part, you should always use the
   #define and not some kind of dynamic value or global variable.

 * in generic code that is compiled once and used by multiple boards,
   all parameters such as UART numbers should be passed in at
   initialization time.

This rule should also apply for the keypad.  The keymap has to move to
some board-specific 'const' data structure which gets handed into the
keypad driver at the time it is initialized.  As all of the Compal
boards share the same mapping, this should of course not be copied N
times, but all refer to one common file.  Only the pirelli would provide
a different mapping.

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From altaf329 at gmail.com  Wed Aug  8 10:15:23 2012
From: altaf329 at gmail.com (Altaf)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Working of ccch_scan and capturing the SDCCH.
In-Reply-To: <CAHL+j0_AC4KdHD0p-LbHDB_a2axgrYEDnjBLbhk9XD+KyPb4YQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1342793493322-4025206.post@n3.nabble.com>
	<CAHL+j09BFy+=uZT_uTV0iLEBN+xSbiBAPuvs30jyvp6iFb_-SA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMG-S90kGJoo+9J+AKMvydooEw41V18FYYpTgCMcXW0uJ7F1eg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j09sCSHbNm_y-9TtPsqnO_Y9EcYoO-kKLP3dm9_wV30z+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMG-S90kTX4q1LGTShy1X0m_1rd80o59FqxhQZAyVAF1EJAJFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j0_AC4KdHD0p-LbHDB_a2axgrYEDnjBLbhk9XD+KyPb4YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1344420923416-4025252.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hello.

When I follow the IMM ASS and again find the ASS CMD ( for TCH ) and make
the phone to follow it, I am receiving bursts(TCH and SACCH) both uplink and
downlink. I can see SI5 and SI6 on the wireshark.

For example If my duration of the call is 10 sec then the number of bursts
during the call will be (10/577us).
But I dont receive those many number of bursts.  Am I correct in this issue.

Are 4 phones necessary to record the whole conversation (UL and DL).?



Regards,

Altaf



--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Working-of-ccch-scan-and-capturing-the-SDCCH-tp4025206p4025252.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From pauldart at gmail.com  Wed Aug  1 09:49:40 2012
From: pauldart at gmail.com (Paul Dart)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:49:40 +0100
Subject: EMFCamp - A UK Hackcamp this summer!
Message-ID: <CAOEO7so+MianaxZ0u8AfnkuyrO1G_7rRFRe1eNjwGjNGg_ex8g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello !

Although not entirely on topic, Harold is happy for me to post to
these lists about an event I've been involved in.

Electromagnetic Field is a UK hacker/maker camp that is occurring in
just under a months time. In case you haven't, here's the gist:

Electromagnetic Field is a non-profit three day camping festival for
people with an inquisitive mind or an interest in making things:
hackers, geeks, scientists, engineers, artists, and craftspeople.

It's taking place in Milton Keynes between the 31st August and the 2nd
September and is inspired by European camps such as the Chaos
Communication Camp and Hacking At Random, which means that we have an
absurd internet connection to a field, and power to every tent.

There will be talks and workshops on everything from genetic
modification to lockpicking, blacksmithing to high-energy physics,
reverse engineering to electronic engineering, quadcopters to beer
brewing and crocheting to carpentry. If you decide to talk about
something, there's space for you to do so, and plenty of people who
want to listen.

The campsite will be littered with interesting things to play with and
explore, from ride-on tanks to giant dinosaurs. And more lasers than
you can shake a laser-covered stick at.

Attendees are encouraged to form villages and put on activities for
other people around the camp, and we're going to have villages
covering everything from gaming to 3D printing. If you'd like to form
a village, get in touch!

    https://www.emfcamp.org/tickets

Your ticket will give you the following things:

* A secure place to camp for three days.
* Power to your tent.
* Very fast internet access (both wired and wireless).
* Access to running water and hot showers.
* A whole pile of awesome talks and workshops by amazing people.
* A full bar.
* One fully programmable camp badge, equipped with wireless communications.
* A campsite equipped with weird and wonderful things to play with.
* A weekend unlike any other in the UK.

If we've still not sold you, maybe you should read our website and blog,
which have exhaustive information about the camp:

    https://www.emfcamp.org

    http://blog.emfcamp.org

If you've got any questions feel free to email me or the team!

Paul



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Mon Aug  6 07:44:46 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:44:46 +0200
Subject: August 8, 8pm / Osmocom meeting in Berlin
Message-ID: <20120806074446.GL26533@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi all!

This is the announcement for the next Osmocom Berlin meeting.

	Aug 08, 8pm @ CCC Berlin, Marienstr. 11, 10113 Berlin

Harald will be giving a short presentation on contemporary smartphone
hardware architecture.

Furthermore, updates and discussions on various current developments
will be exchanged, such as

 * Demo of OsmoPCU on sysmoBTS
 * Status of new SMSC
 * Planning phase of custom calypso board

If you are interested to show up, feel free to do so.  There is no
registration required.  The meeting is free as in "free beer", despite
no actual free beer being around.

Updates and the blog post can be found here:
http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/blog/osmug-20120808

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




From kesmtp at freenet.de  Mon Aug  6 21:17:27 2012
From: kesmtp at freenet.de (Mathias K.)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:17:27 +0200
Subject: August 8, 8pm / Osmocom meeting in Berlin
In-Reply-To: <20120806074446.GL26533@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120806074446.GL26533@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <50203467.9000905@freenet.de>

Hi!


Where is the conference number? ;-). It would be nice to meet this event virtually for none berlin 
citizens. Maybe there is some planning, maybe there is no reason/possibility to do that. But there 
are some interesting topics that i want to hear, maybe discuss.


Regards,

Mathias


On 06.08.2012 09:44, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> This is the announcement for the next Osmocom Berlin meeting.
>
> 	Aug 08, 8pm @ CCC Berlin, Marienstr. 11, 10113 Berlin
>
> Harald will be giving a short presentation on contemporary smartphone
> hardware architecture.
>
> Furthermore, updates and discussions on various current developments
> will be exchanged, such as
>
>   * Demo of OsmoPCU on sysmoBTS
>   * Status of new SMSC
>   * Planning phase of custom calypso board
>
> If you are interested to show up, feel free to do so.  There is no
> registration required.  The meeting is free as in "free beer", despite
> no actual free beer being around.
>
> Updates and the blog post can be found here:
> http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/blog/osmug-20120808
>




From laforge at gnumonks.org  Tue Aug  7 08:48:51 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:48:51 +0200
Subject: August 8, 8pm / Osmocom meeting in Berlin
In-Reply-To: <50203467.9000905@freenet.de>
References: <20120806074446.GL26533@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<50203467.9000905@freenet.de>
Message-ID: <20120807084851.GR26533@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Matihas,

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:17:27PM +0200, Mathias K. wrote:
> Where is the conference number? ;-). It would be nice to meet this
> event virtually for none berlin citizens. 

Sorry, I don't really like the idea of having an unknown number of
people listening in on conversations we have face to face.

> Maybe there is some planning, maybe there is no reason/possibility to
> do that. But there are some interesting topics that i want to hear,
> maybe discuss.

I suggest that you post any comments / questions / topics to the
respective mailing lists.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From andreas at eversberg.eu  Mon Aug  6 21:38:00 2012
From: andreas at eversberg.eu (jolly)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:38:00 +0200
Subject: free O2 prepaid
Message-ID: <50203938.50704@eversberg.eu>

15 euros for O2:

5258-9990-7370

*103*525899907370#

have phun...




From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Tue Aug  7 09:27:54 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:27:54 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <5020df9b.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

I would like to ask if there is interest to have some kind
of Osmocom meetings in Bavaria. Suggested location is here
at my place in the south-east of Bavaria near Pfarrkirchen. 
There are no large cities close, but the location is still 
in reach with a car, some examples (single distance):

  - from Munich:   130 km
  - from Passau:    55 km
  - from Salzburg:  90 km
  - from Linz:     140 km

Why at my place ? There is some GSM/3G/TETRA equipment
and RF measurement gear around which could be demonstrated.

It is not yet decided when and how (regular or "on demand")
this meeting should take place. Before that I want to find out
if there is interest at all and how many people are interested.

So please write to the list what you think.

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From catchall at blombo.de  Wed Aug  8 05:38:53 2012
From: catchall at blombo.de (Martin Auer)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:38:53 +0200
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <5020df9b.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
References: <5020df9b.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
Message-ID: <A3CC531F-580B-4C9C-ABB6-10DE2588B1BB@blombo.de>

Am 07.08.2012 um 09:27 schrieb "Dieter Spaar" <spaar at mirider.augusta.de>:

> I would like to ask if there is interest to have some kind
> of Osmocom meetings in Bavaria. Suggested location is here
> at my place in the south-east of Bavaria near Pfarrkirchen. 
> There are no large cities close, but the location is still 
> in reach with a car, some examples (single distance):
> 
>  - from Munich:   130 km
>  - from Passau:    55 km
>  - from Salzburg:  90 km
>  - from Linz:     140 km
> 
> Why at my place ? There is some GSM/3G/TETRA equipment
> and RF measurement gear around which could be demonstrated.
> 
> It is not yet decided when and how (regular or "on demand")
> this meeting should take place. Before that I want to find out
> if there is interest at all and how many people are interested.
> 
> So please write to the list what you think.
> 
I would like to join you at your place for such a meeting. Very good idea.

Martin



From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Wed Aug  8 18:31:20 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:31:20 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <5022b079.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

As a quick follow up: The proposal for the meeting is intended
for everyone interested in the various Osmocom projects (e.g.
OpenBSC, OsmocomBB, TETRA, SimTrace, OsmoSDR). The meeting is
not limited to only those who are actively participating.

I will wait until next week to see how many people are
interested, so far I am aware of two persons.

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From alexander.chemeris at gmail.com  Wed Aug  8 16:44:12 2012
From: alexander.chemeris at gmail.com (Alexander Chemeris)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:44:12 +0400
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <5022b079.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
References: <5022b079.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
Message-ID: <CABmJbFU-Hjw691fmeE_4qu+jKM5aLtBfPphuAJmr4Nd4U61D0Q@mail.gmail.com>

I'd love to join, but it strongly depends on the exact dates of the
meeting. I have very tight travel schedule in the next months.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Dieter Spaar <spaar at mirider.augusta.de> wrote:
> As a quick follow up: The proposal for the meeting is intended
> for everyone interested in the various Osmocom projects (e.g.
> OpenBSC, OsmocomBB, TETRA, SimTrace, OsmoSDR). The meeting is
> not limited to only those who are actively participating.
>
> I will wait until next week to see how many people are
> interested, so far I am aware of two persons.
>
> Best regards,
>   Dieter
> --
> Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de
>



-- 
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ??? ???????
http://fairwaves.ru



From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Wed Aug  8 19:06:47 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:06:47 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <5022b8c7.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

Hello Alexander,

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:44:12 +0400, "Alexander Chemeris" <alexander.chemeris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd love to join, but it strongly depends on the exact dates of the
> meeting. I have very tight travel schedule in the next months.

Just to avoid any misunderstanding: Those meetings are not supposed
to be something similar to the Osmocom Developer Conference earlier
this year. The idea is to have a regular or "on demand" oportunity to
meet with people for a few hours and demonstrate or talk about
the Osmocom projects or share new ideas.

Its comparable to the regular Berlin meetings, you can get an idea
of what goes on there:

  http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/blog/osmug-20120808

Of course you can attend, if you are close (Munich airport is 120 km
away) but I would expect that Berlin is more convenient if you come
from really far away and Berlin already has regular meetings.

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Thu Aug 16 14:20:24 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:20:24 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

So far three persons have indicated their interest to join
a meeting at my place.

Considering the time it takes to drive to my place, it
probably makes sense to have the meeting at the weekend
(either Saturday or Sunday) so that there is more time
for the meeting itself. I can suggest one of the following
dates for the first meeting, somewhere between 10:00 to 
18:00 on each day:

   25.8. (Sa) or 26.8. (Su)
    1.9. (Sa) or  2.9. (Su)
    8.9. (Sa) or  9.9. (Su)

So please let me know when you have time and also make
suggestions in which Osmocom topic you are interested
in so that we can have some sort of agenda for the
meeting to make best use of the time.

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From osmocom at blombo.de  Thu Aug 16 19:21:20 2012
From: osmocom at blombo.de (Martin Auer)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:21:20 +0200
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
References: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
Message-ID: <0C6708D1-91C7-42AC-98AC-D71306323358@blombo.de>

Am 16.08.2012 um 14:20 schrieb "Dieter Spaar" <spaar at mirider.augusta.de>:

> So far three persons have indicated their interest to join
> a meeting at my place.
> 
Perfect

> Considering the time it takes to drive to my place, it
> probably makes sense to have the meeting at the weekend
> (either Saturday or Sunday) so that there is more time
> for the meeting itself. I can suggest one of the following
> dates for the first meeting, somewhere between 10:00 to 
> 18:00 on each day:
> 
Sounds good to me.

>   25.8. (Sa) or 26.8. (Su)
both possible or me

>    1.9. (Sa) or  2.9. (Su)

I prefer Sa, Su not possible

>    8.9. (Sa) or  9.9. (Su)
> 
I prefer Sa, Su might also work


> So please let me know when you have time and also make
> suggestions in which Osmocom topic you are interested
> in so that we can have some sort of agenda for the
> meeting to make best use of the time.

As I was only playing around with osmocom.bb and having basic knowledge in GSM and other 3GPP protocols I am open to every topic. Tetra is of interest for me because of the "Digitaler Beh?rdenfunk" (firefighters) and I am especially interested in anything SIGTRAN-related.


> 
> Best regards,
>  Dieter
> -- 
> Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de
> 




From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sat Aug 18 11:59:43 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:59:43 +0200
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
References: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
Message-ID: <20120818115942.GV29525@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi all,

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Dieter Spaar wrote:

>    25.8. (Sa) or 26.8. (Su)
>     1.9. (Sa) or  2.9. (Su)
>     8.9. (Sa) or  9.9. (Su)

I'm fine with any of those dates.  So I'll leave it to the other
attendeeds to decide on the date.  I currently cannot confirm 100% yet,
but at least if no urgent issue comes up, I'm planning to be there.  It
would be a nice 630km motorbike ride from Berlin, if the weather is not
too bad...

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From dongizzmo at gmx.de  Sun Aug 19 19:51:04 2012
From: dongizzmo at gmx.de (Don Gizzmo)
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:51:04 +0200
Subject: AW: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <20120818115942.GV29525@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
	<20120818115942.GV29525@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <053c01cd7e43$f801f980$e805ec80$@gmx.de>

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Dieter Spaar wrote:
>    25.8. (Sa) or 26.8. (Su)
>     1.9. (Sa) or  2.9. (Su)
>     8.9. (Sa) or  9.9. (Su)

I prefer the second weekend (1.9./2.9). Whether it's Saturday or Sunday I
don't mind, both is possible for me.

I'm open to every topic that's GSM-related (and newer protocols). Tetra is
also interesting. Like Martin I was playing around with osmocom.bb and have
basic GSM-knowledge.

Regards,
Alex




From laforge at gnumonks.org  Tue Aug 21 07:02:32 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:02:32 +0200
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
In-Reply-To: <CAAyk0ZR8CoT2+GUfEKUEoArc_Op5pqyD7KSK3cE6BBPaFC4ZVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <502d01a9.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>
	<20120818115942.GV29525@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<053c01cd7e43$f801f980$e805ec80$@gmx.de>
	<CAAyk0ZR8CoT2+GUfEKUEoArc_Op5pqyD7KSK3cE6BBPaFC4ZVg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120821070232.GA16295@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Dear Ellen,

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Ellen Apolinar wrote:
> btw. where is the location when it is 630 km away from Berlin?

As Dieter wrote in his original post:

> at my place in the south-east of Bavaria near Pfarrkirchen

So if you just type "Pfarrkirchen, Germany" into your favorite internet
map service, you should get a pretty clear idea.

As there seems to be frequent misconception:  This is _not_ a developer
conference or anything like that.  Just an informal user group meeting,
like those we have in Berlin every two weeks.

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Wed Aug 22 13:25:02 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:25:02 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <5034ddae.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

I have now selected the day for the meeting which should
match for all who have send me their preferred days. The
first Osmocom meeting in Bavaria near Pfarrkirchen will
be held on:

     Saturday, 1. September, starting at 10:00

If you are going to come, please let me know until
next Wednesday (29. August). I will then send you
a private email with the details of the location.

The agenda is not yet set, but it seems that at least
those who send me their areas of interest are mainly
targeted towards GMS (OpenBSC/OsmocomBB). We can
of course also talk about other stuff, e.g. RTL-SDR,
but for this it would be nice if one of the RTL-SDR
experts would join us (here you have the chance to
receive a nearly clean/empty spectrum without much
noise from other sources ;-).

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From spaar at mirider.augusta.de  Wed Aug 29 19:58:42 2012
From: spaar at mirider.augusta.de (Dieter Spaar)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:58:42 CEST
Subject: Any interest for Osmocom meetings in Bavaria ?
Message-ID: <503e7472.mirider@mirider.augusta.de>

As already mentioned, the Osmocom Meeting will
take place this Saturday, 1.9.2012 at 10:00.

Three people have confirmed that they will come,
I have send them an email with the location details.
Harald is not yet sure if he can attend.

A few suggestions for the meeting:

  - I will run a GSM-1800 network with my test license so
    you can try out OsmocomBB. If you are interested to
    do so please bring your Osmocom phone plus Laptop with
    the already installed OsmocomBB software.

  - We can do some experiments with SIMtrace if there is any
    interest.

  - There should still be enough time for other things, we
    can decide what to do during the meeting.

Best regards,
  Dieter
-- 
Dieter Spaar, Germany                           spaar at mirider.augusta.de



From gouchengcheng at gmail.com  Mon Aug 13 03:43:06 2012
From: gouchengcheng at gmail.com (gcc)
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: about the IMSI Detach in various status
Message-ID: <1344829386984-4025256.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hi, List.

I am studying the IMSI Detach attack now. I have some doubt.

1. if the victim is already off-line, what is the effect of the attack?

2. In my network, I send the IMSI detach Indication, and the base station
sends me 
  the Channel Release. but the victims is still online,why? I am confused?



--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/about-the-IMSI-Detach-in-various-status-tp4025256.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From ml at mail.tsaitgaist.info  Tue Aug 14 11:37:13 2012
From: ml at mail.tsaitgaist.info (Kevin Redon)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:37:13 +0200
Subject: pirelli charging
Message-ID: <1344943892-sup-5873@dennou>

Hi,

Christian Vogel commited the battery charging capability for the C123.
I wanted to know if someone also looked at the Pirelli DP-L10 (maybe steve|m), which uses the USB port for charging (also used serial communication)?
Or maybe it could be possible to use the USB power instead (or along) of the battery, which would be enough for RX only.

thanks,
kevin



From akibsayyed at gmail.com  Tue Aug 14 11:48:25 2012
From: akibsayyed at gmail.com (Akib Sayyed)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:18:25 +0530
Subject: app_ccch_scan for capturing FR data.
Message-ID: <CAMG-S92wyAYGwzVLFBasgXj0zzr3SCgdeQmJb-KhyWCU-mhBrQ@mail.gmail.com>

hello list

i have been trying to sniff FR codec traffic from OpenBTS network.i tried
to modify patch of bob with little help of airprobe.

but when i try to play file toast says bad frame no.

can any one help me with that

here is app link
http://pastebin.com/GwmB7UGK

-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120814/38e4e49a/attachment.htm>

From altaf329 at gmail.com  Wed Aug 15 15:16:35 2012
From: altaf329 at gmail.com (Altaf)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: app_ccch_scan for capturing FR data.
In-Reply-To: <CAMG-S92wyAYGwzVLFBasgXj0zzr3SCgdeQmJb-KhyWCU-mhBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMG-S92wyAYGwzVLFBasgXj0zzr3SCgdeQmJb-KhyWCU-mhBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1345043795636-4025267.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hello

Do you remove the FACCH from your bursts..

Do you perform the Cyclic Redundancy check on your bursts.


Regards,


Altaf





--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/app-ccch-scan-for-capturing-FR-data-tp4025258p4025267.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From altaf329 at gmail.com  Thu Aug 16 15:22:47 2012
From: altaf329 at gmail.com (Altaf)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Moving to TCH without doing a BCCH again when using app_ccch_scan
Message-ID: <1345130567095-4025269.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hello everyone

In one of the ML I have read that, BCCH-SDCCH-BCCH-TCH is required for
listen to the TCH.

In my case(Test N/w) I receive an IMM ASS, go to (SDCCH/4 + SACCH/4) TS:0
subchannel 2.

As soon as I find an ASS_CMD I send a l1ctl_tx_dm_est_req with new channel
parameters and jump to a TCH/F+SACCH/F+FACCH/F   TS 4. I am receiving bursts
after this. 
 
They contain SACCH SI5/6 as I see them in Wireshark and also some bursts (I
hope a mix of FACCH and TCH). Is it necessary to do BCCH again. If I don't
do Won't I receive TCH frames.? Will the be good TCH frames. ?

But I see the tch_schedule_set working good. I receive once UL and next DL
bursts.  and sometimes SACCH.

Can someone explain me.

Thank You

Altaf






--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Moving-to-TCH-without-doing-a-BCCH-again-when-using-app-ccch-scan-tp4025269.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Tue Aug 21 07:10:24 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:10:24 +0200
Subject: Aug 22, 8pm / Osmocom Berlin User Group meeting
Message-ID: <20120821071024.GB16295@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi all!

This is the announcement for the next Osmocom Berlin meeting.

	Aug 22, 8pm @ CCC Berlin, Marienstr. 11, 10113 Berlin

There is no formal presentation scheduled for this meeting.  However,
updates will be provided on various current developments, such as

 * Progress on the CC32RS512 smart card (osmo-cos)
 * Possibly: Status of current attempts to get CSD implemented in OpenBSC

If you are interested to show up, feel free to do so.  There is no
registration required.  The meeting is free as in "free beer", despite
no actual free beer being around.

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




From bresai at live.cn  Wed Aug 29 00:56:16 2012
From: bresai at live.cn (bresai)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: How to flash the original fireware of C118?
Message-ID: <1346201776675-4025279.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hi,

I flashed the rssi application into my C118. The app is really great. But
now I want to flash the original fireware back.
I saved the orignal loader by

host/osmocon/osmoload memdump 0x000000 0x20000 compal_loader_orignal.bin

But when I tried to flash this loader back using

host/osmocon/osmoload fprogram 0 0x000000 compal_loader_orignal.bin,

The phone can't power on.

What did I do wrong?


regards,
wenyao 



--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/How-to-flash-the-original-fireware-of-C118-tp4025279.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From holger at freyther.de  Thu Aug 30 08:32:16 2012
From: holger at freyther.de (Holger Hans Peter Freyther)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:32:16 +0200
Subject: How to flash the original fireware of C118?
In-Reply-To: <1346201776675-4025279.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1346201776675-4025279.post@n3.nabble.com>
Message-ID: <20120830083216.GF14800@localhost>

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:56:16PM -0700, bresai wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> 
> host/osmocon/osmoload fprogram 0 0x000000 compal_loader_orignal.bin,
> 
> The phone can't power on.
> 
> What did I do wrong?

Hi,

there is no documentation on completely restoring the old firmware. As
part of the normal flashing procedure[1] you are flashing both the original
loader and the second loader. So reprogramming the compal_loader.bin will
not give you back the original firmware but it should not brick your device
either.

holger


[1] http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/flashing