Good to know. I'll give a try dfu-util 0.5 next time. You're right: SAM-BA made me loose so much time.

2016-11-10 13:34 GMT+01:00 Michael Kramer <michael.kramer@uni-konstanz.de>:
Hey Felix,

thank you for your answer!
However since holger recommended dfu-util 0.4 I tried the 0.5 version since 0.4 was not available on the website. With the 0.5 version it works. Hope this helps you as well since it's easier to flash.

Greetings,
Michael

Am Dienstag, 08. November 2016 17:47 CET, J. Félix Ontañon <felix.ontanon@podsystem.com> schrieb:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Just to let you know dfu-util 0.9 didn't worked for me either, but
> SAM-BA/sam7utils did!
>
> I just followed this simtrace wiki page instructions to do so (flashing
> using libusb): https://osmocom.org/projects/simtrace/wiki/SIMtrace_Firmware
> The wiki page has the firmware attached in the format required by SAM-BA. I
> compiled it myself with the arm toolchain, though. The tricky part was
> switching to SAM-BA mode, what the wiki page says is true: sometimes it
> just not works ... After 3 or 4 attempts it worked.
>
> I hope this helps.
> Regards.
>
> 2016-10-16 22:28 GMT+02:00 Holger Freyther <holger@freyther.de>:
> >
> >
> > > On 16 Oct 2016, at 22:15, Michael Kramer <michael.kramer@uni-konstanz.de>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2016 22:19 CEST, Holger Freyther <
> holger@freyther.de> schrieb:
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> I've tried both dfu-utils 0.8 and 0.9 on a debian and kali machine.
> Haven't used SAM-BA yet. Should I try that as well?
> > >>
> > >> SAM-BA is a lot more inconvenient and slower than dfu-utils. Could you
> try an older version of dfu-utils? E.g. I started with dfu-utils and

> probably still have this version around.
> > >
> > > Could you maybe check which version it was?
> >
> > oh. I did and then didn't write it down. It was dfu-util 0.4 that I have
> used in
> > the past.
> >
> > holger









--
J. Félix Ontañón