Hi Harald,
> 1) "Framework Schedule"
> I think we should move towards a more defined "framework schedule".
That sounds like a good idea. I generally was happy to hear all the
talks, but some of them were too
technical to really learn something from them. Way above my knowledge
level in that topic.
I could also have done some work then. If we have a schedule, I can be
sure to not miss something
I am interested in while working in another room.
And of course it's good for all that cannot attend on every days to be
able to choose the topics they want to hear.
> 2) "Make use of multiple rooms"
Makes sense. But I think only with the scheduling of presentations. Because if
you are separated from the main room you would likely miss something cool if you
don't always check what topic is currently talked about.
> We could of course also search for another venue, which is larger and
> has more rooms which allows for some growth, but then as indicated we...
To be honest, I really liked the location and its atmosphere (and all
the different
beverages). When using more rooms the space should be sufficient.
This was my first time at an OsmoDevCon and I am glad I was a part of it.
I learned so many new stuff and met new interesting people. Thanks :)