I don't know. Maybe Tom has one?
Otherwise I can try to write myself.

Tom Tsou wrote:

> There was a discussion many years ago about puncturing
> inside or outside of the convolutional coder loops. I preferred
> separating puncturing and convolutional coding because of efficiency.
> Using discrete implementations allows faster implementations.


With best regards,
Vadim Yanitskiy.

2016-10-13 0:58 GMT+07:00 Max <msuraev@sysmocom.de>:
Is there some microbenchmark available? Perhaps we can use it to improve
generated code?


On 10/12/2016 07:51 PM, Vadim Yanitskiy wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> > Unfortunately I could not find any tests for the code in
> > question so the only way to test it is by:
>
> I uploaded tests recently. You can find them here:
> https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/933/4/tests/coding/coding_test.c
>
> > I think the puncturing code should be part of the library (otherwise
> > every user will have to reimplement the same thing again and again).
>
> I am agree with you. We recently discussed this question with Tom Tsou.
> He said, that there was some performance related reasons to perform
> puncturing inside both gsm0503_pdtch_encode() / gsm0503_pdtch_decode().
>
>
> With best regards,
> Vadim Yanitskiy.

--
Max Suraev <msuraev@sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte