Hi, I&#39;m a long time lurker into this project and I&#39;ve wondered something for a bit of time.<div>Knowing that we can use an ip.access nanoBTS to work on OpenBSC, why not adapt OpenBSC for UMA (unlicensed mobile access) standards? </div>
<div>I know over here in the US we currently use UMA with T-Mobile over WiFi to communicate back to the T-Mobile servers and eventually off to the GSM and regular ol&#39; networks.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.umatechnology.org/specifications/index.htm">http://www.umatechnology.org/specifications/index.htm</a> is the UMA specification, and to my knowledge T-Mobile US&#39;s @Home service uses the 1.0.3 protocol revision.</div>
<div><br></div><div>To me it seems like it&#39;d be trivial to make a derived copy of OpenBSC with UMA support up and running, but I&#39;d like some other thoughts into this matter. I&#39;m not a programmer by any means here, so if this is impossible, well, then so be it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-DC</div>