Attention is currently required from: laforge, neels, pespin.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #1:

    Why not removing it? that code seems totally dead to me.

    Because it does not look totally dead to me. I guess the author of this code wanted to look an errno up in the value-string and fall back to printing `rc < 0` or `rc > 0` if it's not present. I updated the patch to do so.

To view, visit change 35678. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.