Attention is currently required from: arehbein, laforge, daniel.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #5:

    Fine with your proposal, but I'd remove "iofd" and use "2" or alike, I'd really avoid naming "iofd" […]

    >The problem I see is: How would you handle compatibility with old code that registers a read_cb? That old code expects to do the actual read itself, from the file descriptor. But in osmo_io that already has happened by the infrastructure at the tiem you get to the read_cb...

    Good point, I didn't think about that. Then probably keep the old code and set the OFD vs IOFD mode internally based on the APIs used.

To view, visit change 33193. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.