View Change

1 comment:

• File s1gw/S1GW_Tests.ttcn:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 168: var ConnHdlrPars pars := valueof(t_ConnHdlrPars);

    I really don't see why you prefer having a valueof(t_ConnHdlrPars) instead of an already in place fu […]

    It's not about having `valueof(t_ConnHdlrPars)` vs `f_new_ConnHdlrPars()`, it's about the burden of adding new parameters in several places. Doesn't really matter if it's a function of a template, since I just copy-paste the testcase template anyway rather than typing all the `f_init()`-stuff manually.

To view, visit change 38099. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.