Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, dexter.
pespin uploaded patch set #2 to this change.
Use always RFN when handling RACH indications
The previous code was really confusing, passing full FNs as RFNs under
certain external conditions, and then assuming the RFN input of
rfn_to_fn() function could actually be a FN.
As a result, we had a lot of code behaving slightly different depending
on whether the incomding FN from pcuif was filled in by a BSC or a BTS.
Avoid this b ehavior differentiation and always assume the most
restricted one, aka RFN.
Change-Id: Ib3b5702168195b595711cd0ff32c211b9aba429d
---
M src/bts.cpp
M src/bts.h
M src/pcu_l1_if.cpp
M src/pcu_utils.h
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/19/33119/2
To view, visit change 33119. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.