pespin submitted this change.

View Change

Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified pespin: Looks good to me, approved laforge: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve osmith: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Objections: fixeria: I would prefer this is not merged as is
vty: 'hopping arfcn add': succeed if adding arfcn already in set

There's no need to fail, simply make it a noop in that case,
everything's fine and everybody is happy (specially when using CTRL
command "apply-config-file" to load a .cfg file containing
modifications.

Related: SYS#6138
Change-Id: Ia4e70d20d48a28c46a21dd10358577e5c798744c
---
M src/osmo-bsc/bts_trx_vty.c
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bts_trx_vty.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bts_trx_vty.c
index 61c52e7..118feca 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/bts_trx_vty.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bts_trx_vty.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@

if (bitvec_get_bit_pos(&ts->hopping.arfcns, arfcn) == ONE) {
vty_out(vty, "%% ARFCN %" PRIu16 " is already set%s", arfcn, VTY_NEWLINE);
- return CMD_WARNING;
+ return CMD_SUCCESS;
}

bitvec_set_bit_pos(&ts->hopping.arfcns, arfcn, 1);

To view, visit change 29551. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia4e70d20d48a28c46a21dd10358577e5c798744c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29551
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged