Attention is currently required from: laforge, fixeria, dexter.
3 comments:
File library/RLCMAC_CSN1_Templates.ttcn:
Patch Set #1, Line 166: utran_target_cell_presence := omit,
I am bit surprised that non present optional fields must not be unbound. […]
the PRESENCE is used during decoding, not during encoding afaik.
I guess this allows generating incorrect messages on purpose for testing purposes?
File library/RLCMAC_CSN1_Types.ttcn:
Patch Set #1, Line 1016: BIT1 ba_psi3_presence,
Add a /* TODO: Rel-8 addition */ here
Patch Set #1, Line 1030: variant (utran_target_cell) "PRESENCE(arfcn_bsic_presence = '1'B, utran_target_cell_presence = '0'B)"
This describes the escape bit mechanism: […]
I think it may make sense to have the ARFCN+BSIC CSN.1 struct as a record here, it would simplify a bit this imho.
Also, you may want to have a look at TAG, it may be clearer here, since in here it's not really about optional fields, but about taking one or another substruct.
To view, visit change 32995. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.