Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, keith.
5 comments:
File src/input/e1d.c:
Patch Set #11, Line 340: osmo_fsm
the question to me is if we really want to call this on every "short read", or just in case of ret < […]
I think this makes sense (but I wonder what happens if we do not get a complete D_TSX_ALLOC_SIZE chunk. This means we would lose the incompletely read chunk?)
Patch Set #11, Line 391: osmo_fsm
likewise here, a SOCK_STREAM socket might in theory do a successful write of any size, if the socket […]
Done
Patch Set #11, Line 414: osmo_fsm
same as above
Done
Patch Set #11, Line 451: osmo_fsm
here I think the existing implementation is OK, as a HDLC socket is an E1_TS_MODE_HDLCFCS socket, wh […]
Yes, makes sense.
Patch Set #11, Line 476: osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(g_e1d_fsm_inst, EV_CONN_LOST, line);
I'm not sure about the exact semantics of SOCK_SEQPACKET here, but I would assume that a zero-length […]
Yes, I think so too. (I have now changed the if above)
To view, visit change 32374. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.