Attention is currently required from: msuraev.

View Change

1 comment:

• Commit Message:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 9: single-use static function to simplify

    What's wrong with having this static function? The compiler will highly likely inline it anyway. From the symbol naming perspective, I think it's fine to keep it in a separate function with self-explaining name. Especially if someone will need to destroy an esme immediately some day.

To view, visit change 30683. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.