Attention is currently required from: pespin.
7 comments:
Commit Message:
Patch Set #1, Line 9: In OM2000 a separate bb_trxc MO does not exist to archive better
"does not exit. To achive" […]
Done
Patch Set #1, Line 10: compatibilty towards classic ABIS and its MOs lets mirror the nmstate of
Abis […]
Done
File src/osmo-bsc/abis_om2000.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 1011: switch (mo_state) {
Move this to a function: mo2nm_state(uint8_t mo_state). […]
Done
Patch Set #1, Line 1032: duplicate_trxc_nm_state(bts, mo);
This looks wrong, you should emit signals for both NM objects not only one? […]
I am doing this in a separate function now. However, I am not sure how to set nsd.obj. What also makes me wonder is why we do not set nsd.obj_class. How does the receiving entity know the kind of object is in nsd.obj?
Patch Set #1, Line 1058: duplicate_trxc_nm_state(bts, mo);
Same, simply explicitly set bb_transc_nm_state->operational = new_state. […]
Done
Not directly related to this patch but indirectly related to have stuff working as expected: AFAICT […]
I think you are correct. I have fixed this in a different patch before this one.
Patch Set #1, Line 2245: otfp->trx->bb_transc.mo.nm_state.administrative = NM_STATE_UNLOCKED;
Not directly related to this patch but indirectly related to have stuff working as expected: AFAICT […]
I have addressed this in a different patch before this one now.
To view, visit change 28896. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.