Attention is currently required from: msuraev.

View Change

1 comment:

• Commit Message:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 21: - We are going to be accessing rrlh->data[3], so we must check for at

    I think it's better to wrap this into static function and add this comment there.

    i agree but i'd rather fix the code dup as separate patch; for now i just want to get the buffer access fix in...

To view, visit change 32421. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.