Attention is currently required from: pespin.

View Change

1 comment:

• File s1gw/S1GW_ConnHdlr.ttcn:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 739: far_id := 1);

    looks like instead we may want to store far_id in erabs[i]?

    FAR ID is not specific to an E-RAB. Each E-RAB has two FAR IDs, it's always 1 and 2. I don't see a reason to store it in the E-RAB state. I can add constants to make it more readable, in a follow-up patch.

To view, visit change 39076. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.