Attention is currently required from: pespin, msuraev.

View Change

1 comment:

• File src/rate_ctr.c:

  • Patch Set #7, Line 365: } w

    won't this have an overflow issue? what if tmier_ticks + expire count wraps the 64bit value and ends up a low integer value? Then timer_ticks will be greater than next and it will not execute this loop ever. I think the safer choice is to really iterate 'expire_count' times?

To view, visit change 30302. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.