Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin.
1 comment:
File sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn:
Patch Set #6, Line 3748: f_pdp_ctx_act(apars);
@vyanitskiy@sysmocom. […]
I don't think it really matters for this specific test scenario whether the requested IP address matches the assigned one. Likewise, I don't think it matters here whether we allocate IP address statically or dynamically.
Just to clarify: I was not the one implementing `f_pdp_ctx_act()`, so I am simply trying to use the existing code base. What you suggest makes sense for those testcases specifically testing the PDP Context Activation procedure. And AFAICS, the existing testcases do not cover these scenarios, unfortunately.
Here I just want to make sure that osmo-sgsn provides the `PDP Context IE` in `SGSN Context Response`. The IP address assignment approach is a less significant detail preceding the "core" phase of the test scenario.
I have two options with the existing code base:
Regarding a), @dwillmann@sysmocom.de told me that it's impossible to encode a `PDP Context IE` in `SGSN Context Response` without an IP address. I just checked 3GPP TS 29.060, section 7.7.29 myself, and AFAICS it **is** possible: we can simply set `PDP Address Length` to 0.
So all in all, I can:
To view, visit change 36601. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.