Attention is currently required from: lynxis lazus.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #1:

    Not about this patch, but what should the RNC lifecycle be? […]

    I'm basically taking what osmo-msc does as a reference here, which has already a way better code logic and data domain tan osmo-sgsn.

    "iu_rnc" in osmo-sgsn is the equivalent to "ran_peer" in omso-msc.

    It makes sense to create an iu_rnc the first time a RANAP RESET is received (which should be in any case the first valid message). There's no need to free iu_rnc peers, we will simply mark them as unavailable when signalled by SCCP layer (this will happen once I introduce the iu_rnc_fsm in a follow-up patch, which will be the counterpart of "ran_peer_fsm" in osmo-msc).

To view, visit change 40976. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.