Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, dexter.
2 comments:
Patchset:
my comments from previous version still apply.
At the moment everything should be fixed. I might have overlooked something though.
Patchset:
This is still work in progress (I haven't set it to work in progress though because I have the feeling that would prevents people from reviewing this.)
One thing that still needs to be addressed is a better error handling. So, basically the question what happens when a RANAP RAB AssignmentRequest is processed but the FSM died because of an error. Or what happens when a RANAP RAB AssignmentResponse comes back from the HnodeB and the FSM is not there, or it is there, but the response is an unsuccessful outcome? This also needs to be covered by the TTCN3 tests as well, so that we can test. Otherwise the implementation behaves fine when tested manually.
To view, visit change 26795. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.