Attention is currently required from: jolly, fixeria, pespin.
7 comments:
File library/GSM_RR_Types.ttcn:
Below in `UplinkAccessIndTV` you're using `uint4_t`. […]
Done
Patch Set #2, Line 597: } with { variant "TAG(cksn, tag = 'B'H)" };
> ... since I see no "tag" nor "cksn" fields in here? […]
The way I did it, the IEI is tied to the message in whihc the IE occurs, and not to the IE itself. In GSM 04.08 and some other protocols there are instances where the same IE has different IEIs depending on where they appear. In this case, the IEI must be "glued" to the containing message, and not to the IE itself.
In this specific instance, I don't know if the CipheringKeySeqNrTV occurs in other places (with or without different IEI). But I don't see anything wrong with it, given that also in the SPEC, the IEIs are listed in the message, and not in the definition of the IE.
Patch Set #2, Line 650: } with { variant (len) "LENGTHTO(es,spare,uai_rach,priority)" };
Please add `variant "PRESENCE(iei = '31'O)"`.
Done
Patch Set #2, Line 656: } with { variant "" };
Missing `variant "PRESENCE(iei = '32'O)"`.
Done
Patch Set #2, Line 663: } with { variant (len) "LENGTHTO(talker_id)" };
Missing `variant "PRESENCE(iei = '33'O)"`.
Done
Patch Set #2, Line 670: } with { variant "" };
Missing `variant "PRESENCE(iei = 8)"`.
Done
ws
Done
To view, visit change 32647. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.