Attention is currently required from: msuraev.

Patch set 4:Code-Review -1

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #4:

    I really don't see the point. The new function is an exact copy of the old. It's just the pointer type that differs. But as the implementations are identical, calling the old function on a non-storage sockaddr is equally safe. What am I missing?

To view, visit change 28995. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.