Attention is currently required from: laforge.

Patch set 2:Code-Review +2

View Change

2 comments:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #2:

    I'm actually wondering why we have such a state to begin with? Isn't it the job of the SCCP provide […]

    yes, after the FSMs were merged, it has already occurred to me that the new code could/should have relied more on sccp_scoc.c timeouts that are already in place, instead of "duplicating" SCCP states. Now the code is there and works correctly... maybe i can take another look some time.

  • Patch Set #2:

    combine votes

To view, visit change 32036. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.